« Investors Decry Proposal Omissions
Submitted by: Ted Allen, Publications
| Main | RiskMetrics Group Releases 2009 Board Practices Study
Submitted by: Sarah Cohn, Communications »

Daily Posts

February 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Email Alerts

Subscribe and receive email alerts when new articles are published!

Enter Your Email Address

Contact Us

Email us with any questions, or a topic you would like to see discussed

EMAIL US

Links

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Value-at-Risk as an Altimeter
Submitted by: Gilles Zumbach, Senior Researcher, Risk Management

In a recent New York Times Magazine cover story, the efficacy of VaR, or Value-at-Risk, was debated. The reference by one risk manager to VaR as an altimeter was perfect and deserves further thought.

VaR as an Altimeter
An altimeter is a reliable but imperfect instrument: essentially it just measures the air's pressure. You can calibrate on the ground before take-off, land five hours later, and find the instrument 100 meters off while on the runway (I have seen it many times). A possible remedy would be just to throw away all altimeters as junk. In practice, every pilot "just looks outside," and, when needed, correct the possible discrepancy between the altimeter and the actual altitude. The point is not to believe blindly the instrument. And, despite the altimeter limitation, every plane in the world includes one at the center of the dashboard as it gives (albeit imperfectly) very important information during a flight.


Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.riskmetrics.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/1186

   
 
About RiskMetrics Group | Disclaimer

Copyright © 2007 RiskMetrics Group


Powered by Movable Type 3.36