« SEC To Discuss Proxy Rules
Submitted by: L. Reed Walton, Staff Writer
| Main | The SEC Splits on Proxy Access
Submitted by: Subodh Mishra, Managing Editor »

Daily Posts

February 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Email Alerts

Subscribe and receive email alerts when new articles are published!

Enter Your Email Address

Contact Us

Email us with any questions, or a topic you would like to see discussed

EMAIL US

Links

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Social Investment Forum Wary of SEC Shareholder Proposals Opening Door to Possible Curbs
Submitted by: Cheryl Gustitus, Head of Communications

Below is a statement the Social Investment Forum issued today on the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) open meeting on proxy access. We welcome other views on the outcome from the SEC's open meeting today.

WASHINGTON. D.C.///July 25, 2007///Social Investment Forum Chair Tim Smith, who also is senior vice president of Walden Asset Management, and SIF CEO Lisa Woll issued the following joint statement today:

"While the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) did not explicitly endorse a proposal today that would limit the rights of shareholders to file advisory resolutions, we are concerned that one of the two proposals put out for public comment has opened the door for possible new curbs on such shareholder resolutions. We need to study the questions the SEC has put forward for public comments. As we noted in our news conference yesterday, we want to be very clear that we will vigorously oppose any step by the Commission to restrict the advisory resolution process.

At the same time, we share the concern of other shareholder advocates that the 5 percent threshold for director nomination is too high.

We are thus going to remain on 'high alert' until this whole situation is resolved in a way that makes it clear that the rights of shareholders have not been diminished.

The SEC needs to understand that any new limit on the rights of investors to participate in the advisory resolution process would trigger a repeat of the contentious 1997-1998 battle in which more than 300 socially responsible investment, religious, labor and other groups coalesced to oppose an SEC staff plan to gut the shareholder resolution process by increasing the threshold for reconsideration of resolutions in subsequent years.

Our members have been deeply involved in the process of shareholder advocacy through letters and dialogue with companies, sponsorship of shareholder resolutions and by voting proxies. For decades, this process has been a central means for formalizing communication between concerned investors and management on social, environmental and governance issues."

For more on the Social Investment Forum, please visit here.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.riskmetrics.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/911

   
 
About RiskMetrics Group | Disclaimer

Copyright © 2007 RiskMetrics Group


Powered by Movable Type 3.36