Why Companies Must Act on Climate Risks
Submitted by: Doug Cogan, Deputy Director of ISS' Social Issues Service
With the launch of the Kyoto Protocol and the E.U. Emissions Trading Scheme, managing greenhouse gas emissions is now a part of doing business in global trading markets. As the United States catches up to this international effort to combat global warming, climate governance practices will assume an increasingly central role in corporate and investment planning.
A new report commissioned by CERES and written by Doug Cogan of ISS' Social Issues Service employs a "Climate Change Governance Checklist" to evaluate how companies are addressing climate change through board oversight, management execution, public disclosure, emissions accounting and strategic planning.
Join Doug Cogan and representatives of the pension and investment community for a one-hour ISS webcast beginning at noon EDT on Tuesday, May 16 for a discussion of this new report and how it can be used by company executives, board members, investors and Wall Street analysts to employ effective climate governance strategies. To register for the webcast, click here.
Ultimately, effective climate governance requires boards and managers working together on strategies to control greenhouse gas emissions, with stakeholder disclosure and investor accountability. Given the sweeping global nature of climate change, climate risk has become embedded, to a greater or lesser extent, in every business and investment portfolio. Companies face not only new risks from regulations, but also direct physical risks that are becoming increasingly apparent. Climate change deserves discussion in securities filings in the many instances in which direct financial risks or opportunities can be identified.
*Physical Risk: Businesses are at risk from the physical impacts of climate change, including the increased intensity and frequency of severe weather events, droughts, floods, storms and sea level rise.
*Regulatory Risk: State, national, and international regulations are putting increasing pressure on companies with emissions from operations or products to invest in emissions controls, purchase carbon credits, or alter their energy use patterns.
*Competitive Risk: Tightly linked to regulatory risk, climate risk preparedness is emerging as a key driver in a company's reputation, growth prospects and ability to compete.
*Technological Opportunities: Companies in many sectors can increase profitability by implementing energy efficiency strategies and developing emission-reducing technologies that meet changing corporate and consumer demands in a carbon-constrained world.
In short, the stakes could not be higher for U.S. companies and investors. The greatest investment opportunities as this new era takes hold will lie with companies that capitalize on this emerging shift in global energy use and production methods. The greatest risks will be with those that choose to ignore those trends and try to carry on with business as usual.
| Permalink | Print Article | Back To Top |











TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.riskmetrics.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/79