Commentary: Two for the Price of One
Submitted by: Bruce Carton, Vice President, Securities Class Action Services
Filing Claims in Securities Class Action Cases can Help Investors Also Get a Share of SEC Settlements
On Feb. 24, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a motion with the court handling its case against Qwest Communications International requesting approval of a plan to distribute a $250 million settlement in a way that reflects an important and growing practice at the SEC.
The plan calls for the money to be distributed through the claims administration process that is underway in a completely separate securities class action settlement involving Qwest. Under this proposal, by filing a single proof of claim in the $400 million Qwest securities class action settlement (deadline: May 2, 2006), an institutional investor will also be able to recover its share of the $250 million SEC settlement. No part of the $250 million will be used to pay fees or expenses of counsel in the securities class action.
I realize that I am likely preaching to the choir here since SCAS clients reading this probably already understand the importance of filing claims in securities class action settlements. The SEC proposal in the Qwest case, however, is worth highlighting because it the latest reminder that the economic cost of failing to file claims in securities class actions can and does go beyond the amount at stake in the class action itself.
There have been numerous other examples over the last 18 months of the SEC and even the U.S. prosecutors dumping settlement money from their own cases into the securities class settlement distribution process:
--September 2004: The SEC announced court approval of its plan to distribute the proceeds of its $150 million settlement with Bristol-Myers Squibb via the claims administrator appointed in a parallel securities class action against the company. This $150 million recovery was in addition to the $300 million recovered by the plaintiffs in the class action settlement.
--February 2005: The SEC filed a motion seeking to have its $25 million settlement with Lucent Technologies transferred to the account established by the claims administrator in the securities class action settlement involving Lucent. The SEC proposed that the claims administrator would distribute the funds to the class members who had already filed claims in that settlement (the claims deadline in the class action was March 2004).
--March 2005: A federal court overseeing the SEC's $1,450,000 settlement with a company called Measurement Specialties approved the SEC's plan to distribute all of this money on a pro rata basis to the class members who had already filed claims and qualified to receive funds under the allocation plan approved by the court in a securities class action against the company (the claim deadline in the class action was August 2004).
--July 2005: The U.S. Attorney's office handling the prosecution of former WorldCom CEO Bernie Ebbers announced that approximately $25 million to $33 million in restitution expected to be recovered from Ebbers would go to the victims of WorldCom via the securities class action settlement fund.
The past few years have seen an explosion in the dollar amounts of SEC civil penalties, to the point where settlements in the hundreds of millions of dollars are now almost routine. Following the enactment of the Fair Funds provision of Sarbanes-Oxley in 2002, these penalties are being distributed for the first time to investors (rather than to the U.S. Treasury). The SEC's distribution plan in the Qwest settlement, and all of the other cases above, demonstrate that in this new era, filing claims in securities class action settlements may be the only way for an investor to recover its rightful share of many significant SEC settlements.
| Permalink | Print Article | Back To Top |











TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.riskmetrics.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/38